Sex discrimination and sexual harassment at work

February 28, 2022

Share this article

Sex discrimination and sexual harassment at work – developments since #MeToo?



A hand holds a sign reading

We recently wrote about the case of a senior ACAS executive, Mr Woods, who was found guilty by his employer of sexual harassment in the workplace and was dismissed. Mr Woods won his claim at the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal, because his employer did not follow a fair process prior to terminating his employment. Mr Woods, however, was not awarded any compensation by the Tribunal in respect of his unfair dismissal due to his own blameworthy conduct and because the Tribunal found he would have been dismissed anyway even if his employer had followed a fair process.
The Tribunal judgment noted Mr Woods’ comments on the #MeToo movement, that “Things have changed since the MeToo movement, I don’t like it but I can understand it. It seems that the rules have changed” and that the “MeToo campaign had lowered the bar for sexual harassment”.
Developments since #MeToo?
The #MeToo movement has raised awareness of sexual harassment in the workplace. Sex discrimination claims, for example, increased by 69% in 2019, and reports of sexual harassment in the workplace have persisted despite the move by many to working from home throughout the Covid pandemic. We have previously commented on what employers can do to try and prevent negative workplace behaviour transcending the ‘new normal’ in our article How will bullies cope in a virtual workplace?
The use of NDAs (non-disclosure agreements, or ‘gagging orders’) has also come under the spotlight recently, particularly in sexual harassment cases. The Solicitors Regulation Authority has issued guidance on the use of NDAs, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission updated its guidance on sexual harassment in January 2020 (see Sexual harassment and harassment at work: technical guidance and Preventing sexual harassment at work: a guide for employers ).
Six universities have recently pledged to stop using NDAs in respect of those who make complaints of sexual harassment. 
The government has committed to introduce duties on employers to prevent sexual harassment and third-party harassment in the workplace (when parliamentary time allows), although the reasonable steps defence (see below) will still be available to employers.
Potential claims
Claims for sexual harassment can be brought by employees (and some others, including job applicants and workers) in the Employment Tribunal under the Equality Act 2010 in relation to unwanted conduct of a sexual nature (which has the purpose or effect of violating their dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment), or if they suffer less favourable treatment because they reject or submit to unwanted conduct of a sexual nature.
Victims of sexual harassment at work could also have separate claims in the civil courts for personal injury or under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and the harassment may also constitute a criminal offence.
Claims for sex discrimination can be brought if a woman suffers less favourable treatment compared to a man.
If an employee is subjected to a detriment (for example, denied a promotion) because they have, for example, made a complaint about harassment, then they may also have a claim for Victimisation.  
Employer’s defence
Claims can be brought in the Employment Tribunal against an employer as being responsible for sexual harassment committed by its employees during the course of their employment. Claims can also be brought against individual perpetrators.  However, there is a defence available to employers if they have taken all reasonable steps to prevent the harassment.
As a minimum, employers should:
  • have equal opportunities and anti-harassment and bullying policies in place;
  • make sure their policies are regularly reviewed and kept up to date;
  • make sure employees are aware of the policies;
  • make sure managers have appropriate training; and
  • make sure that complaints are dealt with properly (and promptly).

We previously reported on a case where the employer was unable to rely on the reasonable steps defence, because their equality training was found to be ‘stale’ and of poor quality, and managers were unaware of what to do when they discovered harassment ( “Stale” training sees employer lose discrimination claim ). In that case, the Employment Appeal Tribunal concluded that the employer should have undertaken refresher training.
Conclusion
While the #MeToo movement has raised awareness, it seems there is still a long way to go. The attitude of Mr Woods, a senior ACAS executive highlights that sex discrimination and sexual harassment still exists in the workplace.
Ensuring policies and procedures are regularly reviewed and updated is one part of the answer, but communicating and enforcing them is equally, if not more important. 
Training and education for staff and managers can also help; particularly courses for all staff covering Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. Please see our training brochure for more information or if you would like to discuss any of these issues then please contact the writer, Marianne Wright, via mw@kilgannonlaw.co.uk or on 0330 124 7811.
Kilgannon & Partners LLP is a specialist employment law firm where our experienced employment law partners offer practical, prompt and professional employment law and HR advice.
28th February 2022. © Kilgannon & Partners LLP 

< Older Post Newer Post >

Recent Posts

Three coworkers reviewing documents at a table in a bright office

Fire and rehire restrictions: what employers need to know ahead of January 2027

By Anthony Thompson • October 22, 2026
New fire and rehire restrictions are expected in January 2027. Discover which contractual changes are affected and how employers can prepare.
Two coworkers reviewing documents at a table with a laptop in a bright office, one pointing thoughtfully

What are the Key Areas Likely to be Impacted by these changes and What Steps Can Employers Take to Prepare for them?

By Nicola Cockerill • October 20, 2026
Explore key employment law changes, the areas they may affect and practical steps employers can take to prepare their business and HR policies.
Three coworkers in a meeting, discussing ideas around a laptop at a conference table.

Unfair Dismissal changes from 1 January 2027: What employers need to do now

September 25, 2026
From 1 January 2027 unfair dismissal protection moves to six months and the compensation cap is removed. See what employers should change now.
Two people talking in a modern office lounge, seated across from each other and holding papers.

The (re)introduction of third-party harassment from 30 October 2026. What the duty means for employers.

September 25, 2026
From 30 October 2026, employers face liability for third-party harassment. Find out what changes and the practical steps businesses should take now.
Three coworkers in discussion at a conference table with a laptop and mugs in a modern office

Employment Rights Act 2025: What the new Sexual Harassment duty means for employers from 30 October 2026

September 25, 2026
From 30 October 2026 employers must take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment and address third-party harassment. See what to do now.
A person in a white lab coat and pink gloves holds a small rainbow heart pin, with a stethoscope draped around their neck.

Did the use of NHS changing room by transgender woman give rise to claims for harassment and/or indirect discrimination?

February 3, 2026
Did the use of NHS changing room by transgender woman give rise to claims for harassment and/or indirect discrimination?
A person with long dark hair, wearing a green and orange patterned top, looks toward the camera against a black background.

Tribunal ruling puts ‘up or out’ employment policies under scrutiny

February 3, 2026
The appeal judgment criticised the original tribunal’s handling of both disability and justification issues. The judgment indicates that employers making dismissals based on assessment of readiness for promotion, without the employee having carried out the work for the role above, will struggle to show that decision is
A person smiling at the camera, wearing a green and orange patterned top against a dark, plain background.

Ms Sanju Pal succeeds in appeal against Accenture at the Employment Appeal Tribunal

January 19, 2026
Ms Sanju Pal succeeds in appeal against Accenture at the Employment Appeal Tribunal – Tribunal’s reasoning on disability discrimination due to endometriosis was “wholly inadequate” and the decision could not stand
Two hands wearing rainbow-colored bracelets come together to form a heart shape.

Non-binary identity does not give rise to the protected characteristic of gender reassignment

December 18, 2025
A tribunal ruled non-binary identity does not amount to gender reassignment. Learn the legal reasoning and workplace implications with Kilgannon Law.
The Houses of Parliament in London at dusk, with the illuminated Elizabeth Tower reflected in the River Thames.

The dismissal of a cleaner employed in two jobs working 17 hour days was fair

December 11, 2025
A tribunal has held that the dismissal of a cleaner working two jobs and 17-hour days was fair. Learn why the decision was upheld, the key factors considered, and what this means for employers managing fatigue and safety risks.
Show More