Blog Layout
Collective Redundancies Part I - Application
Collective Redundancies Part I - Application
Sadly, we have seen an increase in enquiries where the collective redundancy rules apply, and there is the passing reference to them in the Government’s furlough guidance.
In this note we focus on when the law applies. In the second article we look at the obligation in terms of informing and consulting the affected employees. The second article can be accessed here.
According to s188 (1) of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the collective rules will apply “Where an employer is proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less…”.
Below we highlight some of the key aspects to consider:
1. 20 or more
There are two levels of application. If more than 20 employees are affected and where there are more than 100. In both cases, the rules will apply, its just the length of consultation in either case differs. For 20-99 employees, it needs to last for 30 days. For 100+ employees, its 45 days.
2. 90-day period
This is a rolling period, so if, for example, 8 staff were dismissed on 30th March 2020 as a result of COVID 19 and in May 2020 another 12 are made redundant, the rules will apply.
3. “Proposing to dismiss”
A key point (and one that has been the cause of much litigation) is the point at which the rules trigger, as their application is often much sooner than most employers think. The rules apply from the moment you are “…proposing to dismiss…”.
As such, if you are currently planning for the end of the furlough scheme and you consider that further redundancies / dismissals are required, you may well trigger the collective redundancy rules now.
4. Redundancy
As we covered in another recent article, the definition of redundancy is much broader for the purposes of collective redundancy. It's defined as being “…for a reason not related to the individual concerned or for a number of reasons all of which are not so related.” This will cover more than the traditional diminution of work or locality.
When calculating the number affected you should include anyone who has accepted a job offer and which you have withdrawn; depending on the reasons for withdrawal. In the current climate job offers are being withdrawn because of the pandemic, which would need to be included in the calculation.
With the current application of COVID 19, and potential for terms to be varied, any resignations or dismissals that result from a change to terms of employment will also be caught, and so need to be factored into the calculation.
5. One establishment
This is another area that has resulted in litigation, but largely because its arguable whether our domestic legislation is compatible with the European directive.
Following the Woolworths case “one establishment” was held to mean “a local employment unit”. While that meant each individual Woolworths’ store was treated as one establishment in that case, careful consideration of the facts is required to ensure the establishments are correctly identified, where the European Court has also decided that the test is “depending on the circumstances”.
6. Breach
Why does this matter? Well, if you fail to comply with the rules relating to collective consultation, each dismissed employee can claim up to 90 days gross pay as a protective award. There is no length of service required to claim this award nor any cap. It is, in effect, a penalty on you. Considering there could be a minimum of 20 people affected, the liability will be significant.
Further, there may also be a failure to fairly dismiss under ‘ordinary’ unfair dismissal rules as laid out in the Employment Rights Act.
What’s clear is that the short statement in s188(1) has resulted in masses of litigation around its interpretation and application and, at the same time, it’s probably one of the most expensive laws employers can fall foul of.
If you are contemplating dismissals as we approach the end of the furlough period, please do as the Government’s guidance suggests and seek legal advice to ensure you are not triggering the need to consult collectively.
If you would like specific advice, please contact the writer, Matthew Kilgannon, via mk@kilgannonlaw.co.uk
or on 01483 388 901.
Gerard Airey and Courtney Step-Marsden succeed in statutory redundancy pay claim - The Claimant was entitled to refuse an offer to take a lower-ranked role within a very large project
Every April, the Government reviews and makes changes to employment laws, including a review of financial rates. Below we set out a summary of the proposed changes coming into effect in April and beyond.
We are delighted to announce that @DominicHolmes has joined us as a Partner. Dom has over 18 years’ experience advising employers and senior executives on strategic employment law issues, including several years leading the highly-regarded employment team at Taylor Vinters.
We are thrilled to celebrate Marianne Wright well-deserved promotion to Senior Associate!
We are excited to be able to share the news that Kilgannon & Partners and Just Employment Solicitors have joined forces. This has enabled us to further strengthen the firm and create one of the largest boutique employment and immigration law firms in the UK.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been a game-changer in the world of data protection, and its implications for employers in the United Kingdom are substantial. In this comprehensive guide, we will demystify GDPR, exploring its fundamental principles and the profound impact it has on the workplace.
We are delighted to have succeeded in an appeal against HSBC Bank PLC for the Claimant, Ms Chevalier-Firescu.
The EAT has agreed with our arguments advanced by @Elaine Banton of counsel, that the Tribunal was wrong to strike out her claims.
The matter will now be remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal to decide how next to proceed with the case.
Creating a safe and respectful work environment is a fundamental aspect of UK employment law. This article explores the legal obligations placed on employers to address workplace harassment , highlighting the measures they should take to promote a culture of respect and protect their employees' mental health. Understanding Harassment Harassment in the workplace encompass unwelcome behaviour that violates an individual's dignity, creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment, and can have a detrimental impact on mental well-being. Such behaviour can be based on protected characteristics, including race, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, or religion. Legal Framework The Equality Act 2010 is the key legislation governing harassment in the workplace. It provides a legal framework for protecting employees from discriminatory behaviour and sets out the employer's responsibility to prevent and address such conduct. Under the Equality Act 2010, employers have a duty to: Prevent Harassment: Employers should take proactive steps to prevent harassment in the workplace. This includes implementing clear policies, providing training to employees, and fostering a culture of respect. Investigate and Address Complaints: Employers are obligated to thoroughly investigate complaints of harassment and take appropriate action to address the issue. This may involve disciplinary measures, counselling, or mediation to resolve conflicts. Provide a Grievance Procedure: Employers should establish a clear and accessible grievance procedure that allows employees to raise concerns about harassment. This ensures that complaints are addressed promptly and fairly. Vicarious Liability: Employers can be held vicariously liable for the actions of their employees in cases of harassment. This means that employers may be legally responsible for the misconduct of their employees, even if they were unaware of the behaviour. Preventing and Addressing Harassment To effectively address and prevent workplace harassment, employers can implement several measures: Policies and Training: Employers should develop comprehensive anti-harassment and anti-bullying policies that clearly define unacceptable behaviour and provide guidance on reporting procedures. Regular training sessions can also educate employees on their rights and responsibilities. Promote a Positive Work Culture: Employers should foster a work environment that promotes respect, inclusivity, and open communication. This can be achieved through regular communication, team-building activities, and diversity and inclusion initiatives. Encourage Reporting: Employers should encourage employees to report incidents of harassment or bullying without fear of reprisal. This can be achieved by assuring confidentiality, providing multiple reporting channels, and offering support throughout the process. Swift and Appropriate Action: Employers must take prompt and appropriate action when a complaint is made. This involves conducting impartial investigations, providing support to the affected employee, and implementing disciplinary measures when necessary. Legal Implications Failure to address and prevent workplace harassment can result in legal consequences for employers. Employees who experience harassment may bring claims under the Equality Act 2010, alleging discrimination, harassment, or victimisation. If an employment tribunal finds the employer liable, it can order compensation, issue financial penalties, and damage the employer's reputation. Conclusion UK employment law places a significant duty on employers to address and prevent workplace harassment, recognising the impact on employees' mental well-being. By implementing robust policies, providing training, fostering a positive work culture, and promptly addressing complaints, employers can create a safe and respectful environment for their employees. Compliance with legal obligations not only protects employees' rights but also contributes to a productive and harmonious workplace where individuals can thrive professionally and maintain their mental health.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) revolutionised the way organisations handle personal data, and for Human Resources (HR) departments in the United Kingdom, compliance is paramount. This article provides a comprehensive exploration of best practices for HR to safeguard employee data and ensure GDPR compliance in the workplace.
Recognising the importance of inclusivity and equal opportunities, UK employment law mandates that employers make reasonable adjustments, where possible, to accommodate those employees who have a disability including those with certain mental health conditions. These adjustments aim to provide support and enable individuals to perform their roles effectively.